Friday, 24 February 2017

Week 27: Contemporary Issue or Trend in NZ or Internationally

This weeks blog post is a very topical one for me as it is something our staff strive towards daily.   In our last ERO report, this issue came up as a strength for us and was mentioned in our conclusion:

The principal, with the active support of other leaders, provide strong student-centred, improvement focused, professional leadership.

With moving into our new collaborative teaching spaces and the ever changing technological environment, student centred learning can be a challenge and there is always room for improvement. I find in my classroom that it is something that I feel like I get right and then the dynamics or the variables change, thus making it an issue I am constantly addressing.

I believe most teachers and schools are always striving to meet the diverse learning needs and interests of their students and try their best to cater for the vast range of learning styles that we come across.  ERO (p 8 & 9, 2012) say that "If we wish to foster students as "confident, connected, actively involved, lifelong learners", then we must do better".  It is our role and responsibility to examine the research, to reflect on our practice and to make changes that will improve our student learning environment and outcomes. The National Intelligence Council (piii, 2012) say that they "see the potential for greater individual initiative as key to solving the mounting global challenges over the next 15-20 years".  This means that in our classrooms we need to be developing self-managing learners who can recognise their next learning steps and begin to act on them with our support.  They need to be able to recognise a problem and be able to come up with ways to solve it.

ERO (2012) talks about how it is Leaders who usually drive quality teacher practice and curriculum in a school which can lead to a culture focused on the success of their students within their school.  However, they also highlight that the research in the Best Evidence Synthesis (BES) says they need to "support teachers to share "collective responsibility and accountability for students" achievement and wellbeing" (ERO, p10, 2012).

It is our role, as classroom teachers, to really get to know our students well as we have a significant influence on them.  We need to ensure that they are emotionally and socially happy.  For this to happen, positive relationships are vital.  In our school, we have Goal Setting Interviews at the beginning of each year.  We send out information gathering sheets to gather parent voice about their children first,  then we meet with the students and parents to have a conversation around their learning goals and well being.  This gives us a great window into our students and helps us to get to know them as people, not just learners. 

We need to be constantly thinking about innovative and engaging ways to present the curriculum to develop these 21st century skills.  Quality teaching practice and listening to student voice are both key to help keep students at the centre of the learning process.


References

Education Review Office. (2012). Evaluation at a Glance: Priority Learners in New Zealand Schools. Retrieved 18 May 2016, from http://www.ero.govt.nz/assets/Uploads/Evaluation-at-a-Glance-Priority-Learners-in-New-Zealand-Schools-August-2012.pdf
National Intelligence Council. (2012). Global trends: Alternative Worlds. National Intelligence Council: US. Retrieved from https://globaltrends2030.files.wordpress.com/2012/11/global-trends-2030-november2012.pdf
Robinson, V., Hohepa, M., & Lloyd, C. (2009) School Leadership and Student Outcomes; Identifying What Works and Why Best Evidence Synthesis Iteration (BES). Wellington; Ministry of Education. 



Wednesday, 22 February 2017

Week 26 - Current issues in my professional context

Socio economic status

Our school is a state funded school catering for new entrants to Year 6 children. We are a decile 6 school with a roll that ranges between 210 -250. Our children are predominantly European (78%) and Maori (16%) with the remaining children from other ethnic backgrounds including; Pasifika, Japanese, Chinese.  The school is located in northern Christchurch and most children are from the immediate area around the school.  We receive strong and positive parental support from our community and this is reflected in the commitment shown by our Parent Teachers Association (PTA) and our Board of Trustees (BOT).  

Stoll (1998) talks about a school's culture reflecting the people in it, the surroundings and context and also the history of the school.   We are lucky in our context that education is viewed as an active partnership between home and school, with families and teachers working together for the benefit of children's learning and development.  This team approach (parents, teachers, children) helps to nurture our caring family atmosphere.

Stoll (1998, P.9) ) also says that culture "defines reality for those within a social organisation, gives them support and identity and creates a framework for occupational learning".  Our school lives by and through its Child Goals (Resilience, Communicator, Caring Citizen and Thinker) , Values (Respect, Personal Best, Curiosity and Honesty) and our Vision.  Visitors coming into our environment often comment on how these are evident amongst the staff and children.  

Our school vision was created as a meaningful pathway to our students learning and life journey, "Kimihia te ara tōtika – seek the right path".  This vision, I believe links well to Stoll and Fink's (1996) cultural norm of  "lifelong learners" as we are teaching our children that learning is a journey along a pathway an we are all learning together.  As a staff, we often refer to our role and responsibility of "walking the talk" to ensure that we are living and breathing our child Goals and Values to encourage and expect the same from our students and parents. They are interwoven into what we do both in and out of the classroom.  

 Organisational Structure

We have recently undergone a major restructuring where our single cell classrooms have now been transformed into modern dual teaching spaces.  This has led to our school being set up in teaching 'Pods' of two teachers and classrooms.  We are involved in an ongoing process of change as we adapt to the collaborative nature of the spaces and new ways of teaching. The impact of this change has been immense.  It has required us to adapt to changes in team size, to embrace team teaching in a positive way, to support the children in these new larger environments (for whom many find it difficult) and also to support our school community through this immense change. 

  


 Professional Environment

Our team is dedicated, proactive and focused on our own professional learning. It makes our school a great place to be.  It is made up of a mixture of staff who have been there for over 20 years and new staff in their first year of teaching. We are very lucky that quality professional development is seen as a high priority and we have been involved with and guided by many outside experts over the last few years in the areas of mathematics and literacy.  We have high quality expectations of our staff and children and with all the change we have undergone we have all had to really embrace a growth mindset.   

I think one of the biggest barriers that impacts on my practice would be time. As a staff we are constantly asking ourselves how to best manage our time effectively in our new teaching environments as we find we need to make time to meet as a whole staff, in our Junior and Senior teams, in our teaching Pods, have time to do our own planning, preparation and planning and also time to try new ways of doing things. 

To cope with this, this year we are refining our meeting schedules and undertaking the Spirals of Inquiry as a school which we are hoping will help to guide us into more reflective practice and improve student outcomes.  We are trying to be more effective with our meeting times by reducing some to one day a fortnight and making our Pod meetings a priority. We are also using Google Docs and email to share information that doesn't necessarily need a 'meeting'. This is so we can meet with our teaching partner to reflect on our classroom practice which we see as a priority.  "Risk Taking" is another important cultural norm (Stoll and Fink, 1996) and in our environment we a living and breathing this as our staff and students learn to work in our new open environments and take risks trying new ways of learning and doing things. 

My teaching partner and I can also relate to some of the "cultural norms" that Stoll and Fink (1996) refer to.  In particular we use 'celebration and humour' in our Pod as we celebrate success and mistakes and use humour in many situations.  This links well with our child goal of resilience as we model being able to make mistakes to our children and seeing it as a positive step in our learning. 

As a school, I feel it is important for us to keep improving the depth of our reflective practice, to continue to manage our time effectively without increasing pressure on staff and to keep in mind how we, as a school, are developing 21st century skills in our students as we cope with a multitude of change. 



·      
References

Stoll. (1998). School Culture. School Improvement Network’s Bulletin 9. Institute of Education, University of London. Retrieved from http://www.educationalleaders.govt.nz/Culture/Understanding-school-cultures/School-Culture

Wednesday, 8 February 2017

Week 25 - Reflective Practice - Communities of Practice

Reflective Practice

Reflecting on my practice is something I do often, mostly in private, and that it has probably been more reactive than proactive.  But as I delve deeper into readings and my Mindlab journey, I feel that I have not had the depth that I should in my reflection.  It is one thing to reflect at face value but a completely different thing to reflect critically.  My research and new learning has led me to look deeper at the 'why' of my teaching practice.  It has shown me the importance of relational trust with trust with my teaching colleagues, both accepting their ideas and also being able to be honest and open about my own practice. 

Writing this blog is really the first step in this process as it asks us to be open and honest. This is not an easy thing to do, but I'm willing to give it a try and put myself on that wobbly bridge of learning!

Community of Practice

Wenger-Trayner (2015) talk about a Community of Practice (CoP) as a group that is "formed by people who engage in a process of collective learning in a shared domain of human behaviour".  Within a school environment then, it is easy to see how a multitude of CoP's can exist. On reflection, I belong to a variety of CoP's.  First and foremost is my school community.  This is then also broken down into smaller communities of our Junior team and, my most recent CoP, my co-teaching Pod. Last year I began teaching in a new teaching space with a new teaching partner.  We teach year 2/3 children in a collaborative learning environment.

It is this CoP where I have really been challenged professionally and had real engagement with a true community of practice.  My teaching partner and I came into this with our own experiences and knowledge.  For it to be successful, and to achieve the best outcomes for our students, it was crucial for us to outline some common goals and to begin to be on the same page.  

Domain

In our domain, we have the shared interest of positive outcomes for all our students at the core of all that we do.  Wenger-Trayner (2015) highlight that within a CoP, members must have a "commitment to the domain" and also "value their collective competence and learn from each other".  I believe that a willingness to learn from each other is a crucial component in our practice.  This has required us to show an element of vulnerability at times and to acknowledge that maybe we aren't sure about something and to ask each other for help.  When I was in a single cell classroom this was not often something I did but is now becoming a natural process.  I think one of the bonuses has been allowing each other to play to our strengths and support the other teacher in their weaker areas, thus resulting in us both improving our practice as a whole.  Our roles have become more fluent and adaptable in our space as we react to the student's needs and complement our strengths. At times we lead and at other times we follow but we are always both actively involved in our CoP. 

Community
Relationships are at the core of all of this being successful.  For us, we were lucky that we struck a connection early on and that we had many shared philosophies, as teaching in a shared environment is just not something you can do in isolation.  Even though we are responsible for a class of children each within our Pod, we look at all the students in our Pod as 'ours'.  This has resulted in us having constant conversations about all our students, both formal and informal and sharing ideas about ways to support our learners and improve our classroom practice.  This is ongoing and daily.  Even though we are in our second year together, we now have a completely new set of students with completely different needs this year and this has resulted in us having to change many of the processes and systems that we had set up last year. 


Practice

We have regular meetings before and after school to plan, discuss students needs and ways we can support them, share ideas and reflect on our practice.  We now both plan together and all our planning is on Google Docs. This year we are delving deeper into Teacher as Inquiry and using Spirals of Inquiry.  This will help to support us in focusing more of the "why" of what we doing and not so much on the 'what".  

Professional development has become more powerful as we are trying new things together and having those immediate and purposeful professional conversations about their effectiveness. Reflection is a constant process for us, as what works for us one day might not work the next and so we are forever adapting what we do.  This also means that we have to be open to challenging ourselves and trying new things in our ILE.


References

Wenger-Trayner, B. & E. (2015). Introduction to communities of practice: A brief overview of the concept and its uses. Retrieved from http://wenger-trayner.com/introduction-to-communities-of-practice/